A single line order dismissing WPC (OA) No.701 of 2014 after the petitioner stated lack of instructions from the client, granting liberty to file a fresh petition if cause of action subsists.
WPC dismissed; liberty granted to file fresh petition if cause of action subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.C(OA) No.701 of 2014
Sachidananda Sahoo
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
25.03.2022
Order No
1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2 . Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has
received no instruction from his client.
3. Accordingly, the WPC (OA) is dismissed. However, liberty is
given to the Petitioner that he may file a fresh petition, if any cause
of action still subsists.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Subrat
Sachidananda Sahoo
State of Odisha & Others
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
