Petitioners filed a writ petition; counsel stated the file was unavailable. The court dismissed the writ petition with liberty to revive if the file is traced or cause of action survives.
Writ petition dismissed with liberty to revive if file is traced.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) PIL No.9921 of 2016
Nakula Kumar Nathasharma and …. Petitioners others
Mr. A. K. Sarangi, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties Mr. J. Katikia, AGA
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE A. K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER 03.03.2022
Order No.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(A.K. Mohapatra) Judge
M. Panda
Nakula Kumar Nathasharma
State of Odisha
Justice A. K. Mohapatra
Dr. S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
