The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition as it no longer survived following a common judgment passed in a batch case decided earlier. No substantive issues were argued or decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 35058 of 2020
Anjali Patel
…. Petitioner Mr. K.C. Pradhan, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and Others Opposite Parties Mr. S.N. Das, Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 25.02.2022
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(A.K. Mohapatra)
Judge
S.K. Jena/P.A.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and othersReferred¶8
W.P.(C) No.13789 of 2019 (O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and others)
Anjali Patel
State of Odisha and Others
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
A.K. Mohapatra
Parties & counsel
