Appearing a writ petition against an interlocutory order of the OERC, the court held it infructuous as the review petitions were disposed of by a substantive order and dismissed it. No order as to costs.
No order as to costs. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No. 9908 of 2016
Nava Bharat Ventures Ltd.
…. Petitioner
Mr. L. Pangari, Advocate -versus- Central Electrical Supply Utility …. Opposite Parties of Odisha and others
Mr. D. Mohapatra, Advocate for OP No.1 Mr. S.C.Dash, Advocate for OPs.2 & 3
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO
ORDER
Order No . 1.8.2022 5 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
dutta
(S.Talapatra) Judge (M.S.Sahoo) Judge
Page 1 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is infructuous since the review petitions were disposed of by a substantive order.
Nava Bharat Ventures Ltd.
Central Electrical Supply Utility
S. Talapatra
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
