Petitioner sought to quash a tender condition requiring prior work experience. Counsel for the petitioner requested relaxation of the condition due to lack of experience but subsequently moved to withdraw the petition.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 40856 of 2021
Tusharkanta Tiadi
….. Petitioner Mr. N. Lenka, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha and another
….. Opposite parties Mr. P. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
04.01.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Page 1 of 2
persons to participate in the tender process.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Ashok
(S.K. PANIGRAHI)
JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Tusharkanta Tiadi
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
