In a W.P. brought by Sashi Bhusan Jit challenging an appealable order, the two-judge bench declined to entertain the writ petition, granted liberty to pursue remedies before the appropriate forum, and disposed of the petition.
Petitioner granted liberty to pursue remedy before appropriate forum; writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 785 of 2022
Sashi Bhusan Jit
….. Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Dalai, Advocate
Vs.
State of Orissa & Others
….. Opposite parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
16.02.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2
not inclined to entertain this writ petition. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to pursue his remedy before the appropriate forum.
Alok
……………………... ( DR. B.R. SARANGI ) JUDGE
…………….…………..……. ( V. NARASINGH ) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition challenging an appealable order.
Sashi Bhusan Jit
State of Orissa
B.R. Sarangi
V. Narasingh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
