The High Court disposed of this writ petition seeking to quash an order and release EMD. The court declined to entertain it as the contract period had long elapsed, granting liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 21243 of 2012
Sudhansu Kumar Samal
….. Petitioner
Mr. U.K. Samal, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha & Ors.
Opposite parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER 16.02.2022
Order No.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
3
2
petitioner to pursue his remedy before the appropriate forum, if he is so advised.
Alok
……………………... ( DR. B.R. SARANGI ) JUDGE
…………….…………..……. ( V. NARASINGH ) JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudhansu Kumar Samal
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
V. Narasimh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
