Disposed

Bichitra Kumar Baral v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC12 Jan 2022WP(C)/714/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petition was disposed of without merits. The Court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation regarding lease extension for sand lifting within three months under Rule 27(13) of the OMMC Rules, 2016.

What did the court decide?

Direction to opposite party no. 2 to consider the petitioner's representation for lease extension under Rule 27(13) of OMMC Rules, 2016 within three months.

Bichitra Kumar Baral Vs State of Odisha — Land Acquisition | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶3

W.P.(C) No. 714 of 2022

¶4

Bichitra Kumar Baral

¶5

Petitioner

¶6

Mr. M.K. Mohanty, Advocate Vs. ….. State of Odisha & Ors. Opposite Parties State Counsel

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

ORDER

12.01.2022

Order No.

mode.

This matter is taken up through video conferencing

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶16

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to extend the lease period for three and half months for lifting rest quantity of sand of 844 cum from the quarry.

¶17

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-8 and the same may be directed to be considered taking into consideration Rule 27(13) of the OMMC Rules, 2016 within a stipulated time to which

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

learned State Counsel has no objection.

¶20

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-8 and pass appropriate order taking into consideration Rule 27(13) of the OMMC Rules, 2016 within a period of three months from the date of production/communication of authenticated copy of this order.

¶21

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25^th March, 2020, as modified by Court’s notice no. 4798 dated 15^th April, 2021, and Court’s Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7^th January, 2022.

Page 2 of 2

Alok

(S.K. PANIGRAHI) JUDGE

¶26

Page 1 of 2

¶27

Page 2 of 2

Bichitra Kumar Baral v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bichitra Kumar Baral v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Kumar Dash Vs State of Odisha

Ganesh Sponge Pvt.Lt Vs State and Ors.

Hiranya Ku.Samantray Vs Chairman,P.P.T.

Nabin Pradhan Vs State of Odisha

M/S.Sarda Mines Pvt.Ltd. Vs State of Odisha

State Vs Govt.of India