The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack dismissed the writ petition filed by Rabindra Kayal without entertaining it in the interim, directing the petitioner to file an approach under the relevant provisions of the O.P.L.E. Act at an appropriate time.
Writ petition dismissed; no discharge granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4162 of 2022
Rabindra Kayal
Petitioner(s)
Mr. S.K. Mishra, Mr. L. Pradhan, Advocates
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. S.P. Panda, Addl. Govt. Adv.
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
10.03.2022
Order No.
1. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for Petitioner and looking to the averments made in this petition, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition at this stage.
2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. It is, however, made clear that dismissal of the writ petition shall not stand on the way of the Petitioner in making approach at appropriate situation following the provision at Section 8-A & 7 of the O.P.L.E. Act.
(Biswanath Rath) Judge
Ayaskanta Jena
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition concerning the O.P.L.E. Act should be entertained at this stage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rabindra Kayal
State of Odisha
Biswanath Rath
Ayaskanta Jena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
