Single judge order dismissing a writ petition at the interim stage, while reserving the right to approach the Court subsequently under Section 8-A and 7 of the O.P.L.E. Act.
The writ petition is dismissed at the current stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4053 of 2022
Duryadhan Behera
Petitioner(s)
Mr. S.K. Mishra, Mr. L. Pradhan, Advocates
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. S.P. Panda, Addl. Govt. Adv.
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER 10.03.2022
Order No.
1. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for Petitioner and looking to the averments made in this petition, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition at this stage.
2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. It is, however, made clear that dismissal of the writ petition shall not stand on the way of the Petitioner in making approach at appropriate situation following the provision at Section 8-A & 7 of the O.P.L.E. Act.
(Biswanath Rath) Judge
Ayaskanta Jena
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Duryadhan Behera
State of Odisha & Ors.
BISWANATH RATH
Ayaskanta Jena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
