Manaswini Panda Vs the Branch Manager,Sbi,G.Udayagiri

“ (i) Directing the Opposite Party Nos.1 and 2 not to release the entire dues of SBI Life Group Insurance money of Sl. No.145612 (Annexure-1) to the O.P. No.1 being the nominee after the death of Arakhita Panda son of Raghunath Panda Ex-Messenger, as the petitioners are the legal heirs of deceased Arakhita Panda”.

¶12

4. He further submits that through highlighting their grievances, the petitioners have filed a representation on 15.12.2021 at Annexure-3 to the Writ Petition, before the opposite party No.1 but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to opposite party no.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.

¶13

// 2 //

¶14

5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs opposite party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioners.

¶15

6 . The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶16

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Subrat

¶17

Page 2 of 2

Manaswini Panda v. the Branch Manager,Sbi,G.Udayagiri

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manaswini Panda v. the Branch Manager,Sbi,G.Udayagiri

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Keshab Chandra Parida Vs Finace Deptt

Dr. Chinmay Kumar Sahu Vs State of Odisha

Nagardeep Sethy Vs State of Odisha

Pradeep Kumar Bisoi Vs State of Odisha

Chandra Sekhar Sahoo Vs State of Odisha

Kausalya Dei Vs State of Odisha