The High Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation regarding service regularization within two weeks for consideration in three months. Petition disposed of.
Petitioner directed to file fresh representation within two weeks; authority to consider in three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.11211 of 2022
Chandra Sekhar Sahoo …. Petitioner -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties
Petitioner
COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No 19.05.2022
1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for both the Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following
prayer:-
“ Directing the Opp.Party No.2, to regularize the service of the petitioner from 12.07.2020 and in case opp.parties do not show cause or shows insufficient or wrong cause the Hon’ble court be kind enough to make the rule absolute directing the Opp.Party No.2 to take appropriate steps for regularizing the service of the petitioner from 12.07.2020 and further be pleased to direct to grant all other consequential benefit along with interest”.
4. Taking into account the nature of claim made in the Writ Petition and the prayer made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the Petitioner is permitted to make a fresh representation before Opp. party No.2 within a period of two weeks from today.
5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed by the
// 2 //
Petitioner ventilating his grievances, the same shall be considered by Opp. party No.2 in accordance with law and also in the light of the G.A. Department resolution dated 07.09.2013 within a period of the three months from the date of filing of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.2 be communicated to the Petitioner.
6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
Subrat
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
Chandra Sekhar Sahoo
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
