High Court directed the State of Odisha to consider the petitioner's representation for NOC for their institution within three months, without expressing an opinion on merit.
Direction to respondent to consider petitioner's representation and pass appropriate order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 34673 of 2021
Girish Pratap Parida
Petitioner
Mr.G.R. Sethi, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha and another
Opposite party
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
03.01.2022
1
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Alok
(S.K. PANIGRAHI) JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the opposite parties are required to consider the petitioner's representation regarding NOC.
Whether a direction can be issued to grant NOC or consider representation within a stipulated time.
Girish Pratap Parida
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
