Petitioner sought modification of an interim order by changing the word 'reconnection' to 'disconnection'. Court allowed modification in paragraphs 2 and 4 and disposed of the application.
Direction to read 'reconnection' as 'disconnection' in paragraphs 2 and 4 of the order dated 7th February, 2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.39935 of 2021
Kailash Chandra Sahoo
…. Petitioner
-versus-
…. State of Odisha, represented by the Opposite Parties TPCODL (Electrical), Bhubaneswar, Khordha and others.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
Order No.
ORDER
17.02.2022
I.A. No.2166 of 2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
6. The I.A. is disposed of accordingly.
(S. Pujahari) Judge
DA
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to modify the interim order regarding terminology and direction as sought by the petitioner?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kailash Chandra Sahoo
State of Odisha
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
