A petition was filed for review of an order dismissing a pre-arrest bail application and for release on bail in a case under Sections 394 and 34 IPC. The court, finding no merit in the grounds for review, rejected the prayer and dismissed the application.
The prayer for pre-arrest bail is rejected and the ABLAPL is disposed of being dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.593 of 2022
Ashok Nayak
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
Order No.
ORDER 07.02.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
DA
that the aforesaid order is passed on a wrong premises and contrary to the record.
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the pre-arrest bail application should be entertained when the petition is filed to review a recent dismissal for wrong premises.
Whether the prayer for pre-arrest bail under Section 394 read with Section 34 IPC should be allowed in the present circumstances.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
ABLAPL No.11916 of 2021Referred¶5
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashok Nayak
State of Odisha
S. PUJAHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
