The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 by the State of Odisha against certain persons, holding that the petition was barred by delay and laches having been filed two years after the impugned order.
Writ Petition dismissed due to delay and laches; no consideration merits granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 39578 of 2021
State of Odisha and another
Petitioners Mr. M.K. Khuntia, A.G.A.
Vs.
Manindra Nath Behera and another
….. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI Mr. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
13.09.2022
Order No.
( DR. B.R. SARANGI ) JUDGE
( G. SATAPATHY ) Alok/Subhasmita JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition suffering from delay and laches is maintainable after the passage of two years.
Whether the Court is inclined to entertain the belated Writ Petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari Das (W.P.(C) No. 15763 of 2021 dismissed on 16.07.2021)Referred¶14
State of Odisha and another
Manindra Nath Behera and another
B.R. Sarangi
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
