This court dismissed the writ petition on account of delay and laches, citing a prior judgment in State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari Das as an analogous case to deny consideration at a belated stage.
None. The Writ Petition is dismissed as it suffers from delay and laches.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 18796 of 2021
State of Odisha and another
Petitioners Mr. M.K. Khuntia, A.G.A.
Vs.
Satyanarayan Samantasinghar and others
….. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI Mr. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
13.09.2022
Order No.
( DR. B.R. SARANGI ) JUDGE
( G. SATAPATHY ) Alok/Subhasmita JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition suffers from delay and laches warranting dismissal?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari DasReferred¶15
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari Das (W.P.(C) No. 15763 of 2021 dismissed on 16.07.2021)
State of Odisha and another
Satyanarayan Samantasinghar and others
B.R. Sarangi
G. Satpathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
