Disposed

Parimita Mohanty v. the Endowment Commnr.,Bbsr

Orissa HC30 Mar 2022WP(C)/39508/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition regarding the allotment of a shop room by the Endowment Commissioner, the High Court of Orissa granted the petitioner liberty to file a grievance petition within two weeks. The respondent was directed to dispose of the petition within four weeks after providing a hearing opportunity.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file grievance petition within two weeks; respondent directioned to decide within four weeks after hearing.

Parimita Mohanty Vs the Endowment Commnr.,Bbsr — Service and Employment | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.39508 of 2021

¶3

Parimita Mohanty …. Petitioner

¶4

Mr. S.C. Puspalaka, Advocate

-versus-

Order No.

The Endowment Commissioner, Bhubaneswar & another

¶9

…. Opp. Parties

¶10

Ms. P. Naidu, Advocate for Endowment Commissioner

¶11

CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
30.03.2022

¶12

This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode. 2. Heard Mr. Puspalaka, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Naidu, learned counsel representing Endowment Commissioner, Odisha. 3. According to Mr. Puspalaka, the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the authorities in allotting shop room in the premises of Rajdhani Puja Samitee, Ashoknagar, Unit-II, Bhubaneswar, where he claims to have earlier running her business.

¶13

During course of hearing, Mr. Puspalaka submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to file a grievance petition before Endowment Commissioner, Odisha (opposite party No.1) for redressal of her grievances and further prays that a direction be issued to the said opposite party to take a decision on such petition within a specific time period.

¶14

// 2 //

¶15

Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to file a comprehensive representation before opposite party No.1 within a period of two weeks along with a copy of this order by registered post. In the event, such a representation is filed, the opposite party No.1 is directed to take a decision on the same in accordance with law within a period of four weeks after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as opposite party No.2.

¶16

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶17

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

¶18

Prasant

¶19

(Biswajit Mohanty)
Judge
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge

¶20

Page 2 of 2

Parimita Mohanty v. the Endowment Commnr.,Bbsr

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parimita Mohanty v. the Endowment Commnr.,Bbsr

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Hatwar Vs Spl. Land Acquisition Officer,Nuapada

Loknath Sa Vs State of Odisha

Laxman Goud Vs State of Odisha

Prativa Mohanty Vs Chief Administrator,Lord Shree Jagannath Temple Administrator,Puri

Sandhyarani Sarangi Vs State of Odisha

Prasadi Putel Vs State of Odisha