Petitioner voluntarily withdrew the writ petition while seeking a commitment from the respondent to dispose of a land acquisition case within two weeks, if the petitioner approached him for final redressal.
Disposed of as withdrawn with a two-week timeline for disposal of underlying L.A. case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.5439 of 2022
Ashok Kumar Hatwar …. Petitioner
Mr. S. Khan,
Advocate
-versus-
Special Land Acquisition …. Opp. Party
Officer-cum-Rehabilitation
& Resettlement Officer,
Nuapada
Mr. H.M. Dhal,
Additional Government Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
29.03.2022
02. 1. This matter is taken up through video conferencing
mode.
2. Heard Mr. S. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner
and Mr. H.M. Dhal, learned Additional Government
Advocate.
3. During course of hearing, Mr. Khan wants to
withdraw this writ petition as he wants to approach the
sole opposite party for redressal of the grievances of the
petitioner by filing a petition for expeditious disposal of L.A.
Case No.20 of 2005 pending before him.
// 2 //
(Biswajit Mohanty) Judge
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Prasant
Page 2 of 2
Ashok Kumar Hatwar
Special Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Rehabilitation & Resettlement Officer, Nuapada
Biswajit Mohanty
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
