Court directed respondent to consider petitioner's representation regarding retrospective promotion without expressing an opinion on merits.
Direction to consider representation for retrospective promotion within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 39194 of 2021
Durga Prasad Barik
….. Petitioner Mr.L.Mohanty, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha and another
….. Opposite parties
Standing Counsel for S&ME Deptt.
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
18.01.2022
1
2
continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021, and Court’s Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.
Ashok
(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)
Durga Prasad Barik
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
