Quashed

Sachin Agrawal v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC6 Dec 2022WP(C)/38016/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged orders rejecting the petitioner's tender bid without reasons. The court quashed the impugned orders due to lack of reason assignment and non-communication, directing the authorities to follow due procedure in any fresh tender.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of the impugned orders dated 17.11.2021 and 20.11.2021 and direction to follow due procedure in fresh tender.

Sachin Agrawal Vs State of Odisha — Public Procurement and Tenders | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶3

W.P (C) No.38020 of 2021

¶4

Sachin Agrawal

¶5

State of Odisha & Ors.

¶6

….. Petitioner

¶7

Mr. Rakesh Behera, Advocate Vs. ….. Opposite Parties Mr. T. Patnaik, ASC (O.Ps.1 & 3 to 5) Mr. S. Rath, Advocate (O.P.2)

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

¶10

MR. JUSTICE B.P. SATAPATHY

¶11

ORDER 06.12.2022

¶12

Order No. 8

¶13

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

¶14

Heard Mr. Rakesh Behera, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; Mr. T. Patnaik, learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State-opposite parties.

¶15

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the orders dated 17.11.2021 and 20.11.2021 under Annexures-7 and 8, by which opposite party no.2 has rejected the tender of the petitioner for package No.OR-05386/PMGSY-III (Barch-II), and further to issue direction to the opposite parties to issue work order in favour of the petitioner.

¶16

Mr. Rakesh Behera, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner vehemently contended that order dated 17.11.2021

¶17

¶18

rejecting the bid of the petitioner is arbitrary, unreasonable and contrary to the provisions of law. More so, the same has not been communicated to the petitioner and, as such, no reason has been assigned in the order impugned for rejection of his bid.

¶19

Mr. T. Patnaik, learned counsel appearing for the Stateopposite parties contended that since there were procedural irregularities in the tender process and also cancellation of the bid of the petitioner, now the authorities have taken decision to go for a fresh tender by cancelling the tender process, to which learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court finds, which is also agreeable by the parties that the bid of the petitioner has been cancelled by the authority, vide order dated 17.11.2021 under Annexure-7 without assigning any reason, and that too the order of cancellation has not been communicated to the petitioner. Thereby, the impugned cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Accordingly, the order dated 17.11.2021 under Annexure-7 and the consequential order dated 20.11.2021 under Annexure-8 are liable to be quashed and are hereby quashed. In the meantime, since the authorities have taken decision, as stated by learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State-opposite parties, to go for fresh tender, so far as the work in question is concerned, this Court is of the considered view that in the event the authorities go for a fresh tender, it should be done by following due procedure in the interest of justice, equity and fair play.

¶21

¶22

With the above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶23

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

¶24

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE

¶25

Alok

¶26

(B. P. SATAPATHY) JUDGE

Sachin Agrawal v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin Agrawal v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prasanna Kumar Mishra Vs Project Director, Nhai, Sambalpur

Rajkishore Behera Vs the Collector and District Magistrate , Angul

Mukundalal Chowhan Vs State of Odisha

M/S.Mdsg Construction Pvt. Ltd., Nuapada Vs State of Odisha

Raghumani Harijan @ Raghunath Domb Vs State of Odisha

Pruthwiraj Patra Vs State of Odisha