Rajkishore Behera Vs the Collector and District Magistrate , Angul

“It is therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct the Opposite Parties to acquire the entire village of the petitioners in spite of 39.24 Hectors of land as the decision was taken in the minutes of the meeting held on 18.11.2010, Annexure-2”.

¶18

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioners states that highlighting their grievance, the Petitioners have made representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.

¶19

5 . As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to

¶20

Page 1 of 2

¶21

consider the representation filed by the petitioners vide Annexure-4, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶22

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

¶23

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE

¶24

Alok/Subrat

¶25

(B. P. SATAPATHY) JUDGE

¶26

Page 2 of 2

Rajkishore Behera v. the Collector and District Magistrate , Angul

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajkishore Behera v. the Collector and District Magistrate , Angul

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudhir Singh Educational and Charitable Trust, Bbsr Vs State of Odisha

Budhu Rana Vs State of Odisha

Lipsha Preet Naik Vs Union of India

State of Orissa Vs Raj Kishore Nayak

Manas Ranjan Sahu Vs Union of India

Prasanna Kumar Mishra Vs Project Director, Nhai, Sambalpur