The Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the State of Odisha against Tusarkanti Mohanty. The judgment held that the petition suffered from delay and laches, citing a recent order, and thus deserved no consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 34707 of 2020
State of Odisha and another
Petitioners Mr. M.K. Khuntia, A.G.A.
Vs.
Tusarkanti Mohanty and another
….. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI Mr. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
13.09.2022
Order No.
( DR. B.R. SARANGI ) JUDGE
( G. SATAPATHY ) Alok/Subhasmita JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed with a two-year delay should be entertained.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari DasReferred¶14
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari Das (W.P.(C) No. 15763 of 2021)
State of Odisha
Tusarkanti Mohanty
B.R. SARANGI
G. SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
