Dismissed
Bibhuti Bhusan Sahoo v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCWP(C)/34167/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition of Bibhuti Bhusan Sahoo dismissed for lack of instruction for counsel.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 34167 of 2020
Bibhuti Bhusan Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. M.K. Rath, Advocate
-versus-
… State of Odisha and Others Opposite Parties Mr. Debakanta Mohanty, Addl. Govt. Advocate CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
Order No. 08.08.2022
02. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he has no
instructions.
2. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S.K. Jena/Secy.
Bibhuti Bhusan Sahoo
State of Odisha and Others
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court