State of Odisha appealed against a Sessions Court conviction under Section 304 Part I IPC. The High Court dismissed the appeal, noting the respondent had served the sentence and been released over 10 years prior, finding no error requiring interference.
Leave to appeal declined; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLLP No. 28 of 2006
State of Odisha
…. Appellant
Mr. J. Katikia, Addl. Govt. Advocate -versus-
Nabakrushna Padhi
… Respondent
Mr. Deepak Kumar Panda, Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 08.08.2022
seven years.
Page 1 of 2
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
S.K. Jena/Secy.
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the conviction and sentence under Section 304 Part I IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of Odisha
Nabakrushna Padhi
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
