Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Prasanti Biswal Vs State and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2022)

Home
Orissa HC
2022
Prasanti Biswal Vs State and Ors.Prasanti Biswal v. State and Ors.

Disposed

Prasanti Biswal v. State and Ors.

Orissa HC12 Sept 2022WP(C)/3391/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Cuttack disposed of Writ Petition No. 3391 of 2013 as infructuous on account of efflux of time without substantive reasoning.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No. 3391 of 2013

Prasanti Biswal

Petitioner

Mr.A.K. Mohanty, Advocate

Vs.

State of Orissa & Ors.

….. Opposite Parties

Mr.P.P.Mohanty, AGA

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

ORDER

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
PRASANTI BISWAL
respondent
STATE OF ORISSA

Coram

AI extract

DR. B.R. SARANGI

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 12 Sept 2022 · September
Registered: 11 Feb 2013
Case no.: WP(C)/3391/2013

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from B.r.sarangi Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Shiba Prasad Rath Vs State of Odisha
2 Sept 2022
State of Orissa Vs Baidyanath Mishra
2 Sept 2022
Prafulla Kumar Mohanty Vs State of Orissa
2 Sept 2022
State of Odisha Vs Saswati Mohanty
12 Sept 2022

Cite this judgement

Prasanti Biswal v. State and Ors., WP(C)/3391/2013 (OD), decided on 12 September 2022.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

DR. B.R. SARANGI and SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Disposed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was disposed of on the ground that, by efflux of time, the matter had become infructuous. No substantive legal principles were elaborated.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

12.09.2022

Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

05.

It is contended that by efflux of time, this matter has become
infructuous.

In view of the above submission, the matter stands disposed
of as infructuous.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Arun/Banita (S.K. MISHRA)
JUDGE

Page 1 of 1

SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

CNR

ODHC010024232013

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

B.r.sarangi Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Disposal

Disposed Off

M/S.Biraja Construct Vs State and Ors.

12 Sept 2022

M/S Dnc Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mcl, Sambalpur

12 Sept 2022