Manoj Kumar Mishra v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court held that the Public Interest Litigation was not maintainable for service law matters and dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No. 33004 of 2021
Manoj Kumar Mishra and Others …. Petitioners Mr. B.R. Barik, Advocate
-versus-
Order No.
State of Odisha and Others CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
…. Opposite Parties Mr. S.N. Das, Additional Standing Counsel
ORDER 08.02.2022
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
S.K. Jena/P.A.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a PIL was maintainable for service law prayer.
Manoj Kumar Mishra and Others
State of Odisha and Others
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court