The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte award of the Labour Court. Since a prior related writ petition was disposed of by setting aside that award and remanding the matter, the Court held the present petition infructuous and disposed of it.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C). No.14138 of 2005
D.F.O., Wildlife Warden, Chilika Wildlife Division, Balugaon
…. Petitioner
Mr.P.K.Muduli, AGA
-versus-
Mr. Sankarsan Sahoo …. Opp. Party None
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 04.01.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
( R.K.Pattanaik)
kabita
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition challenged after disposal of a related petition remains maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.F.O., Wildlife Warden, Chilika Wildlife Division, Balugaon
Mr. Sankarsan Sahoo
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
