The High Court of Orissa allowed the petitioner to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation with liberty to file a representation to the authorities concerned, and consequently dismissed the writ petition.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) PIL No.31778 of 2020
Subasini Nayak …. Petitioner Mr. G. P. Jena, Advocate
-versus-
Governor, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. Debakanta Mohanty, AGA
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER 06.01.2022 Order No. 02. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a representation with the authorities concerned. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R. K. Pattanaik) Judge
M. Panda
Subasini Nayak
Governor, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai
R. K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
