The High Court disposed of an unadmitted income-tax appeal filed over 14 years ago. The Court held that admitting the appeal would upset the prevailing status quo and left the question of law open for decision in another appropriate case.
The appeal was disposed of with the question of law left open for decision in another appropriate case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ITA No.78 of 2008
…. Commissioner of Income Tax, Appellant Bhubaneswar
Mr. R.S.Chimanka,Sr.Advocate -versus-
…. Shri Sathya Sai Trust Respondent None
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 06.01.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
the question of law open for decision in some other appropriate case, the appeal is disposed of.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
kabita
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to admit an income-tax appeal filed after the impugned order had held the field for nearly 14 years without any hearing or admission?
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar
Shri Sathya Sai Trust
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
