The Writ Petition was disposed of without expressing opinion on merits. The Court directed Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate order within four weeks.
Direction to Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate order within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 30470 of 2022
Pancha Das
….. Petitioner
Mr.A.K.Sahoo, Advocate.
Vs.
State of Orissa & Others
Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K.Muduli, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
01.12.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 01. 2. Heard.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
“Under the circumstances, the Petitioner therefore prays that notice of ‘Rule Nisi’ be issued to the Opposite Parties calling upon them to show cause as to why the Opposite Parties shall not be directed to consider and dispose of the petition at Annexure-1 Series above.
And upon the Opposite Parties not showing cause or failing to show adequate cause, the said Rule be made absolute and a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ as may issued directing the Opposite Parties to consider and dispose of the petition under Annexure-1-Series above within a stipulated time period”.
4 . In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-1-Series and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
Page 1 of 2
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-1-Series, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Subrat
(B. P. SATAPATHY)
JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Pancha Das
State of Orissa
DR. B.R. SARANGI
MR. BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
