This Court disposed of a writ petition seeking direction to consider a pending representation regarding payment of compensation and other benefits for specific plots of suit land in Malkangiri district, Odisha.
Direction to Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-7 and pass appropriate order within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 29861 of 2022
Santi Sankhari
Petitioner
Mr.M.Mohanty, Advocate.
Vs.
State of Odisha & Others
Opposite Parties
Mr. H.M.Dhal, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
30.11.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 01. 2. Defects as pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within a week.
3. Heard Mr. M.Mohanty, learned counsel for Petitioner and Mr.H.M.Dhal, learned counsel appearing for State-Opposite Parties.
4. The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
“(a) Admit the writ application
(b) Call for the records
(c) Issue RULE NISI calling upon the Opp. Parties as to why due compensation in respect of the suit land i.e. Plot No.115 Hc.0.1500 R under Khata No.79/52, Plot No.116 Hc.0.0340R in Khata No.79/157 of Mouza-Basantpur, M.V.39, P.S/Dist.Malkangiri shall not be paid in favour of the petitioner and other benefits to which the petitioner is entitled to.
(d) If the opp.parties fail to show cause or shown insufficient cause the said rule Nisi be made absolute
Page 1 of 2
(e) In alternatively the representation under Annexure-7 pending before O.Ps No.2 and 3 may be considered within time stipulated giving opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner”.
5 . In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-7 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
6. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-7, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.
Subrat
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(B. P. SATAPATHY)
JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Opposite Party No.2 shall consider the pending representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-7 within four weeks.
Santi Sankhari
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
Biraja Prasantha Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
