The High Court of Orissa quashed an impugned order rejecting the petitioner's claim for benefits, relying on its prior judgment in Prasanta Kumar Mohapatra. The Court remitted the matter to the authority for reconsideration expeditiously.
Quashing of the impugned order dated 02.06.2021 and remittal of the matter to the authority for reconsideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 29602 of 2021
Rajen Singh
….. Petitioner Mr. S. Samal, Advocate
Vs.
….. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER 24.11.2022
Order No.
Arun
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's claim for benefits decided under Ritanjali Giri can be quashed in light of Prasanta Kumar Mohapatra.
Whether the matter should be remitted to the authority for fresh consideration.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ritanjali Giri @ Paul vrs. State of Odisha (School & M.E. Deptt.) & OrsReferred¶13
Ritanjali Giri @ Paul vrs. State of Odisha (School & M.E. Deptt.) & Ors : 2016(I) ILR 1162 · Who else cites this
Prasanta Kumar Mohapatra & othersFollowed¶14
Prasanta Kumar Mohapatra & others (W.P.(C) No.23312 of 2020 disposed of on 28.09.2021)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajen Singh
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
