The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition relying on an apex Court judgment, directing the authorities to consider the petitioner's case accordingly within three months.
Directions to consider the petitioner's case in light of the apex Court judgment and pass appropriate orders within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 24091 of 2022
Manas Kumar Satpathy
Petitioner
Mr. R. Samal, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha and others
Opposite Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER 24.11.2022
02
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
Alok
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of in light of the apex Court's judgment in Malaya Nanda Sethy
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Malaya Nanda Sethy v. State of OrissaRelied on¶3
Malaya Nanda Sethy v. State of Orissa, Civil Appeal No. 4103 of 2022
Manas Kumar Satpathy
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
