The High Court disposed of a writ petition as infructuous on the ground of the efflux of time without any substantive reasoning or engagement with the legal propositions.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 29347 of 2013
Ganapati Mohapatra
….. Petitioner
Mr. D. Ray, Advocate
Vs.
Chief Engineer, Water Resource Deptt., Khurda & Ors.
….. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
12.08.2022
Order No.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
02.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(S.K. MISHRA) Ashok/Banita JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
Ganapati Mohapatra
Chief Engineer, Water Resource Deptt., Khurda & Ors.
B.R. Sarangi
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
