The High Court dispensed with personal appearance. The respondent staged a refund cheque for the petitioner in compliance with a prior order; the writ petition and interim application were disposed of.
Disposed of the writ petition and the interim application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 13215 of 2019
Pradeep Kumar Mohanty
….. Petitioner
Mr. S. Palit, Sr. Advocate Vs.
Tahasildar, Khaira & Another ….. Opposite Parties
Mr.J. P. Pattnaik, GA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
14.09.2022
I.A. No.11839 of 2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
14.
“That, the Deponent, in compliance of the order dated 12.08.2022, seeks to refund the amount of Rs.44,75,450/(Rupees Forty Four Lakhs Seventy Five Thousand Four Hundred Fifty Only) in shape of A/c Payee Axis Bank Cheque bearing Cheque No.002810, dated 13.09.2022 issued in favour of “Pradip Kumar Mohanty”.
Page 1 of 2
with.
Arun/Banita
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(S.K. MISHRA)
JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Pradeep Kumar Mohanty
Tahasildar, Khaira
DR. B.R. SARANGI
S.K. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
