Disposed

Odisha Energy Distribution and Construction Pvt. Ltd., Bbsr v. Md., Orissa Small Industries Corp., Cuttack

Orissa HC19 Dec 2022WP(C)/29070/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the High Court of Orissa disposed of the matter without expressing an opinion on merits. The Court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation regarding unpaid dues and pass an appropriate order within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondent directed to consider petitioner's representation and pass appropriate order within four weeks.

Odisha Energy Distribution and Construction Pvt. Ltd… — Company and Corporate | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P (C) No.29070 of 2022

¶3

Odisha Energy Distribution and Construction Pvt. Ltd., BBSR

¶4

Odisha Energy Distribution ….. Petitioner and Construction Pvt. Ltd., BBSR Mr. S. Mishra, Advocate Vs. MD., Orissa Small ….. Opposite Parties Industries Corporation, Cuttack & Another State Counsel

¶5

CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 19.12.2022 Order This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. No. 01. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:- “It is in the circumstances, humbly prayed you’re your Lordship may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition, issue notice to the Opposite parties to show cause as to why this writ petition shall not be allowed ad if the Opposite Parties do not show cause or show insufficient or false cause then after hearing the counsel for the parties be pleased to allow the writ petition by directing the Opp. Party No.1 to pay the dues of the petitioner and/or the amount of Rs.11,76,333/- which has been received by it from TPCODL with interest at the earliest and be further pleased to pass any other or further order/orders as deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite

¶6

Page 1 of 2

¶7

Party No.1 vide Annexure-5 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.

¶8

5 . As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-5 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶9

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

¶10

Alok/Sangita

¶11

(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(B. P. SATAPATHY)
JUDGE

¶12

Page 2 of 2

Odisha Energy Distribution and Construction Pvt. Ltd., Bbsr v. Md., Orissa Small Industries Corp., Cuttack

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Odisha Energy Distribution and Construction Pvt. Ltd., Bbsr v. Md., Orissa Small Industries Corp., Cuttack

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manas Ranjan Das Vs Union of India

Urmila Singh Vs the Union of India

Mala Majhi Vs State of Odisha

Rutwicka Rutuparna Khadanga Vs State of Odisha

Dr. a.Tanuja Vs State of Odisha

Laibani Mahananda @ Kushal Vs State of Orissa