The High Court of Orissa disposed of an interim application seeking clerical modification of the erstwhile order dated 19.12.2022. The court modified the order to correct the reference to the opposite party.
The order dated 19.12.2022 is modified to correct the mention of opposite party no.2 to opposite party no.6.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 29063 of 2022
Rutwicka Rutuparna Khadanga ….. Petitioner Mr. J. Sahu, Adv.
Vs.
State of Odisha and others
….. Opposite Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE B.P. SATAPATHY
ORDER
31.01.2023
I.A. No. 1019 of 2022
seeks for correction of ‘opposite party no.2’, as mentioned in paragraphs-4 and 5 of the order dated 19.12.2022, as ‘opposite party no.6’.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Ashok
(B.P. SATAPATHY) JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order dated 19.12.2022 modifying opposite party number 2 to opposite party number 6 in a previous order requires correction in the present application.
Rutwicka Rutuparna Khadanga
State of Odisha and others
B.R. Sarangi
B.P. Satpathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
