The High Court of Odisha disposed of Writ Petition (C) No. 28294 of 2020, filed by Khudiram Sahoo, on the ground that the petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 28294 of 2020
Khudiram Sahoo
….. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Swain, Advocate
Vs.
….. State of Odisha and Ors.
Opposite parties Additional Govt. Advocate
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER 10.03.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. 2. Mr. S.K. Swain, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of the above submission, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. ……………………... ( DR. B.R. SARANGI ) JUDGE …………….…………..……. ( SAVITRI RATHO ) JUDGE
Arun/Puspa
Khudiram Sahoo
State of Odisha and Ors.
B.R. Sarangi
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
