Union of India v. Kishore Chandra Mohanty
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition by Union of India dismissed for want of prosecution as counsel failed to appear due to lack of instructions after three years of pendency.
Writ petition by Union of India dismissed for want of prosecution as counsel failed to appear due to lack of instructions after three years of pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 19937 of 2018
Union of India and others
….. Petitioner Mr. B. Dash, Adv.
Vs.
Kishore Chandra Mohanty and another
….. Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Ojha, Adv.
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER 10.03.2022
Page 1 of 2
Ashok/Bichi
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
(SAVITRI RATHO) JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Union of India
Kishore Chandra Mohanty
B.R. Sarangi
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court