Single judge order directing Opposite Party No.4 to consider a representation by petitioners regarding UGC scale of pay within three months, without expressing opinion on merits.
Order directed Opposite Party No.4 to consider representation within three months and pass appropriate order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No. 27519 of 2022
Pranati Mohanty and others
….. Petitioners
Mr. D.N. Mishra, Advocate
Vs.
Union of India and others
….. Opposite parties
Mr. B.S. Rayaguru, CGC & State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
18.11.2022
Page 1 of 2
No. 26692 of 2011, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.
Arun
(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to the Scale of pay as per UGC guidelines from date of entitlement.
Pranati Mohanty and others
Union of India
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
B.R. Sarangi
Parties & counsel
