This Court disposed of a writ petition seeking directions for transit of forest produce. The Divisional Forest Officer had already rejected the application, rendering no further adjudication necessary.
Writ petition dismissed with observation to assail the final order rejected by the Divisional Forest Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 27480 OF 2022
Amar Mohanty
…. Petitioner
Mr. Sidheswar Mallik, Advocate -versus-
State of Odisha and another
…. Opp. Parties
Mr. Swayambhu Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
17.11.2022
to the Divisional Forest Officer, Keonjhar Wild Life Division, Anandapur-Opposite Party No.2 to pass necessary orders on his application filed under Rule 7 of the Odisha Timber & Other Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1980 (For short ‘the Rules’) for removal and transit of forest produce.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
ms
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amar Mohanty
State of Odisha
Divisional Forest Officer, Keonjhar Wild Life Division, Anandapur
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
