The High Court of Orissa directed the registry to convert the pending RPFAM into a WP(C) because the challenged order under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 requires it.
Direction to the Registry to convert the RPFAM to WP(C) and list it after the S.R.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM NO. 280 OF 2022
Satyabrata Pati …. Petitioner
Mr. Gokulananda Padhi, Advocate
-versus-
Ipsita Nanda
…. Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
bks
16.11.2022
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satyabrata Pati
Ipsita Nanda
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
