M/S.Neelachal Ispat v. Workman Sri Pratap
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition as infructuous in an order dated 12.07.2022, without recording reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.25072 of 2012
The Management of M/s. Neelachal …. Petitioner Ispat Nigam Limited
M/s. P. Pradhan, Advocate and associates -versus…. Their Workman Sri Pratap Kumar Opposite Party Jena
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
12.07.2022
Order No.
08. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that the
present petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as such.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S.K. Guin
The Management of M/s. Neelachal
Ispat Nigam Limited
Sri Pratap Kumar
Justice R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court