The single judge dismissed a writ petition seeking a direction to stop financial benefits under the Mo Kudia Scheme for specific opposite parties, holding that the grant would be contingent on the outcome of a pending civil suit and interim relief could be sought there.
The petition was disposed of; the earlier interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.10070 of 2016
Laxmi Dakua
…. Petitioner Mr. S.S. Rao, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties Mr. Ishwar Mohanty, ASC
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
12.07.2022
Order No.
9th May, 2008 and 9th June, 2008 of the Government of Odisha.
Page 1 of 2
order passed earlier stands vacated.
TUDU
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction for the respondents not to provide benefits under the Mo Kudia Scheme while a civil suit regarding the property is pending.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Laxmi Dakua
State of Odisha
R. K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
