In this writ petition regarding inaction and denial of certified copy in a mutation case, the Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Sub-Collector within three weeks.
Liberty granted to file an appeal before the Sub-Collector, Jajpur within three weeks enclosing the order and available documents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 23321 OF 2019
Sridhar Nayak Petitioner
Mr. Ramadev Baral, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opp. Parties
Mr. Sarojananda Mishra, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
18.05.2022
Page 1 of 1
// 2 //
no transaction was found over Plot No.635 under Khata No.59 situated in mouza Nahaka, Jajpur Road during the period from 1st January, 1993 to 20th January, 2020. As such, the transaction basing upon which the Opposite Party No.3 managed to record the land in his name is not in existence. In view of the above, the Tahasildar, Vyasa Nagar had also requested the Sub-Collector, Jajpur to grant permission to file a suo motu appeal before the competent authority, which has not yet been granted.
Page 2 of 3
// 3 //
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper
application.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
ms
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to file an appeal regarding mutation case order when the certified copy is not obtained and administrative appeal permission is withheld.
Sridhar Nayak
State of Odisha
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
