In an application for extension of time to comply with a previous order to vacate quarters in Rourkela, the Court dismissed the filing as it was submitted well after the stipulated deadline had expired.
The application for extension of time is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) NO. 7843 OF 2021
Surendra Singh …. Petitioner
Mr. M.K. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opp. Parties
Mr. B. Panigrahi, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
07.02.2023
I.A. No.1473 of 2023
“7. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the Petitioner shall vacate the Quarter No.C/179, Sector-22, Steel Township, Rourkela by 31st December, 2022 and deliver vacant possession of the quarters to the Assistant General Manager (TS) EN, NEA & EV, Town Services Department, Rourkela Steel Plant, Rourkela-Opposite Party No.5 by that date.”
bks
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for extension of time filed after expiry of the stipulated period should be entertained.
Surendra Singh
State of Odisha
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
