Allowed

Damodar Mohanty v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC8 Sept 2022WP(C)/22772/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking to count past service in a Job-Contract Establishment for pension. Relying on settled precedents ordering similar benefits, the Court directed authorities to extend such benefits to the petitioner within three months.

What did the court decide?

The opposite parties directed to extend all such benefits in favour of the petitioner within three months from the date of communication of the certified copy of the order.

Damodar Mohanty Vs State of Odisha — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.22772 of 2022

Damodar Mohanty

…. Petitioner

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

¶7

…. Opposite Parties

¶8

COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

08.09.2022

Order No

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

¶13

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. S. K. Patra, learned counsel appearing for Accountant General (A & E), Odisha.

¶14

3. The Petitioner has filed this writ Petition seeking direction to the Opposite Parties to count his past service rendered in the Job-Contract Establishment for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefit within a stipulated period.

¶15

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that similar matter had come up before this Court in O.J.C. No. 2405 of 1985 and after constitution of the Odisha Administrative Tribunal the same was transferred to the Tribunal and registered as T.A. No. 11 of 1993. The said case was disposed of on 21.10.1994 by the learned Tribunal by following the decisions of the Apex Court and

¶16

// 2 //

¶17

by giving direction to the competent authority to count the past service rendered by the petitioner in Job Contract Establishment towards pension and pensionary benefit and after such orders were passed, pension of the petitioner was directed to be calculated, drawn and disbursed in his favour within two months from the date of receipt of the copy of the judgment. The order passed in T.A. No. 11 of 1993 was challenged before the Apex Court by the State, which was dismissed vide order dated 17.07.1995.

¶18

5. It is further contended that similar matter had also come up before this Court in O.J.C. No. 2147 of 1991, which was decided on 24.03.1992 and this Court has considered the case of Job Contract employees for regularization of service and for pension and pensionary benefits. In O.A. No. 3020 (C) of 2003 (Nityananda Biswal v. State of Orissa and others), the Tribunal vide order dated 04.01.2004 also directed that the period of the engagement of the petitioner in job contract establishment should be taken into account as qualifying service and accordingly his pension and other pensionary benefits be revised and paid to the petitioner therein. The order passed in O.A. No. 3020 (C) of 2003 was also challenged by the State before this Court in W.P.(C) No. 14244 of 2006. This Court vide order dated 09.04.2014 dismissed the writ application preferred by the state against the order passed by the Tribunal. The state also preferred Special Leave to Appeal (C) CC No. 12573 of 2015 against the order passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 14244 of 2006, which was dismissed by the apex Court vide order dated 13.07.2015.

¶19

Page 2 of 3

¶20

// 3 //

¶21

6. In view of the above settled position of law, nothing remains to be reconsidered by this Court. Accordingly the opposite parties are directed to extend all such benefits in favour of the petitioner in terms of the directions given by the Courts as mentioned above, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of the certified copy of the order.

¶22

7. With the above observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶23

8. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

¶24

Subrat

¶25

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge

¶26

Page 3 of 3

Damodar Mohanty v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Damodar Mohanty v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Tarini Vs State of Odisha

Bhaskar Chandr Maharana Vs State of Odisha

Reena Mahali Vs State of Odisha

Lakshmana Behera Vs State of Odisha

Dambrudhar Meher Vs State of Odisha

Kumuda Ranjan Meher Vs State of Odisha