Petitioner's writ petition was disposed of by applying the reasoning of a prior order in another Writ Petition hearing same issues, with no separate ruling handed down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) (T) No.26 of 2018
Rajesh Kumar Tarini
…. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
07.09.2022
Order No
1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard.
3. It is agreed by learned counsel for the Parties that the
issue involved in this Writ Petition has already been decided by
the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.7281 of 2018 &
4848 of 2021 disposed of on 24.06.2022.
4. Therefore, in view of the reasons stated in the order dated
24.06.2022 passed in W.P.(C) No.7281 of 2018 & 4848 of 2021,
this Writ Petition stands disposed of in terms of the said order.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
Rajesh Kumar Tarini
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
