Writ petition regarding premature encashment of a fixed deposit direction from a Lok Adalat; the single judge disposed of the petition without substantive adjudication on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.21921 of 2022 (Through Hybrid mode)
Ekangini Naik …. Petitioner
Mr. D. Dash, Advocate
-versus-
…. The Manager In Charge, Magma Opposite Parties HDI, General Insurance Company Ltd., BBSR
Mr. R. C. Panigrahi, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
Order No.
ORDER 19.10.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
“3. Parties are to satisfy Court on constitution of National Lok Adalat and whether or not it has power to modify its award.”
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
Prasant
Page 2 of 2
Ekangini Naik
The Manager In Charge, Magma Opposite Parties HDI, General Insurance Company Ltd.
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
